Climate Change & Energy Policy
Climate and energy policy has shifted sharply since 2025 as Washington rolls back federal climate rules amid ongoing legal and political fights.
- EPA repealed the 2009 "endangerment finding" — Administrator Lee Zeldin called it "the single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history," projected to save $1.3 trillion (EPA).
- The repeal, plus rollbacks of vehicle emissions and mercury/air toxics rules, triggered lawsuits — More than a dozen health and environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, Earthjustice, and the Natural Resources Defense Council, sued (The Guardian; Reuters).
- Congress phased out clean-energy tax credits — The 2025 "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" ended many Inflation Reduction Act incentives, including EV purchase credits and home energy-efficiency credits (CNBC).
- DOJ is fighting state "climate superfund" laws — It sued New York and Vermont to block them, and most similar state bills have stalled elsewhere in 2026 (E&E News; EID Climate).
- The Supreme Court will weigh climate tort liability — It agreed to hear Suncor Energy v. Boulder County this fall on whether local governments can sue fossil fuel companies under state tort law for climate damages (SCOTUSblog).
- Green New Deal-style proposals have faded from the Democratic mainstream — The party now pushes narrower measures, like a Green New Deal for public housing (Semafor).
Where each side stands
Every point below is sourced to a real organization, official, or news report — click through to read it in full context.
Conservative
Trump and Zeldin argue the 2009 finding became the legal basis for a sprawling "Green New Scam" of climate rules that cost trillions without any accompanying environmental benefit, and its repeal restores consumer choice in vehicles (EPA).
American Petroleum Institute CEO Mike Sommers says the "Demand Decade" ahead, driven partly by AI data centers, requires unleashing more oil, natural gas, and LNG exports, calling permitting reform the top 2026 policy priority (Fox News).
President Trump's February 2026 executive order directs the Department of War to prioritize coal-fired power, arguing that intermittent renewable sources cannot guarantee the continuous baseload power that military installations require (GovInfo — Executive Order 14386).
The Department of Justice argues New York's and Vermont's laws violate the separation of powers, the Commerce Clause, and interfere with foreign affairs by imposing strict liability for decades-old, lawful energy production (National Today).
The Heritage Foundation has long argued that EPA global-warming rules and similar climate agendas produce trillions in lost GDP, higher household energy costs, and hundreds of thousands of job losses (The Heritage Foundation).
Cato Institute scholars argue that policies like an inflated social cost of carbon distort investment decisions and that a more "rational" approach weighs the real costs of decarbonization against modest, manageable climate risks (Cato Institute).
Progressive
Union of Concerned Scientists senior scientist Julie McNamara called the repeal "wrong on statute, deceptive on science, reckless on impacts," warning it strips away the legal basis for regulating the country's largest source of greenhouse gases (Union of Concerned Scientists).
Climate advocates rallying outside EPA headquarters, including the Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council, denounced the repeal as "corruption" that will worsen asthma, extreme weather, and economic damage (The Guardian).
Backers of state "climate superfund" and tort litigation argue the "polluter pays" principle should apply to greenhouse gases just as it does to other hazardous pollution, an approach the Colorado Supreme Court allowed to proceed in Boulder County's case against Exxon and Suncor (Mintz).
The Sunrise Movement continues to call for a rapid shift to 100% clean, renewable energy paired with millions of union jobs and racial and economic justice investments (Sunrise Movement).
Climate Power estimates Trump administration actions have caused the loss or delay of over 172,000 clean energy jobs, and E2's tracking shows tens of thousands of construction jobs and billions in investment canceled in 2026 alone (The Guardian; E2).
E2's Bob Keefe warned that Trump's coal lifeline is turning the U.S. into "a disconnected petrostate," raising electricity prices while deterring the clean-energy investment that could otherwise flow to American communities (PBS NewsHour).
Key facts both sides cite
Data and polling that inform the debate — both camps draw on these figures, even when they read them differently.
2025 ranked among the hottest years ever recorded — NASA and NOAA data show 2025 as the second- or third-warmest year globally since record-keeping began, behind only 2024 and effectively tied with 2023 (NASA; NOAA).
Americans remain deeply split by party on climate causes, though overall views have been stable — Pew Research finds 48% of U.S. adults say climate change is mostly due to human activity, including 75% of Democrats but just 21% of Republicans, a roughly 54-point partisan gap that has persisted since 2016 (Pew Research Center).
Concern about climate change is near historic highs even as satisfaction with the environment hits a record low — Gallup's 2026 poll finds 44% of Americans worry "a great deal" about global warming — among the highest since 1989 — while only 35% rate U.S. environmental quality as excellent or good, a record low (Gallup; Gallup).
The Inflation Reduction Act's clean-energy investments have disproportionately flowed to Republican districts — E2 analysis found roughly 60% of IRA-linked clean energy projects — representing about 85% of total investment — landed in Republican congressional districts, even though no Republican member of Congress voted for the law (Renewable Energy World / E2).
Every citation on this page
- EPA — Largest deregulatory action announcement
- The Guardian — Environmental groups sue over endangerment finding repeal
- Reuters — Environmental groups challenge Trump decision
- CNBC — Clean energy tax credits repeal in tax bills
- E&E News by POLITICO — 5 climate court battles to watch in 2026
- EID Climate — Climate Superfund bills sweeping defeat in 2026
- SCOTUSblog — Supreme Court to hear Colorado climate case
- Semafor — The Green New Deal fades as climate activism evolves
- Fox News — API on 2026 energy wars and AI
- GovInfo — Executive Order 14386, Clean Coal Power Generation Fleet
- National Today — DOJ says NY climate superfund law unconstitutional
- The Heritage Foundation — True Costs of EPA Global Warming Regulation
- Cato Institute — Climate Rationality
- Union of Concerned Scientists — Endangerment finding repeal analysis
- The Guardian — Climate leaders condemn EPA rollback as "corruption"
- Mintz — Colorado Supreme Court allows climate tort litigation
- Sunrise Movement — Green New Deal
- The Guardian — State of the Union, clean energy jobs lost
- E2 — Clean Economy Works, April-May 2026 Analysis
- PBS NewsHour — Trump coal lifeline, critics warn of costs
- NASA — Global Temperature Earth Indicator
- NOAA NCEI — Assessing Global Temperature and Precipitation in 2025
- Pew Research Center — Americans on what causes climate change
- Gallup — Climate change concern near its high point
- Gallup — Americans' rating of environment hits new low
- Renewable Energy World — Report shows IRA benefiting red states most